:The Mundane Actions We Take To Reduce Waste In Our Everyday Lives Make A Difference.

The mundane actions taken by individuals living in a society for reducing waste in our everyday lives can result in making a difference. With the help of effective actions taken to reduce waste, people can bring an effective change within the society. In the recent times, waste management has turned out to be one of the most serious issues across the globe because it isn’t just a sanitary and environmental problem which is harming soil, river, lakes, ground, drinking water, soil and human heath, but it is an indication about municipal level of management and civilization of countries (Strengers 2011). The population growth and mechanism of urbanization together with a good standard of living are crucial elements which lead to rapidly expanding amount of waste. However, handling of waste, treatment potential and recycling of municipal’s waste is turning out to be a significant indication of municipality’s management level, particularly for developing countries (Jaillon, Poon & Chiang 2009). This essay is about mundane actions that can be taken by individuals for reducing waste in our daily lives. A critical analysis is done regarding ways through which mundane actions can make a difference in our lives through reduction of waste.

Main Body

Waste has turned out to be a core concern in large number of progressed and few of progressing cities throughout the world. In these cities, waste has even been appeared as a crisis because of the exhaustiveness of landfill spaces at higher rate. The increase of consumptive culture and materialism has caused an increase in waste generation per capita. With the increased atmospheric protection awareness, need of managing waste along with unified solution for the pollution caused by waste has been increased. Waste has even turned out to be a controversy in political stage because of adoption of various strategies of waste management. Progression of the industry of waste has a major impact on concern of various social groups for managing waste (Sharholy et al. 2008).

Human civilization’s early history tells that treatment of waste was not done intentionally as it was not an issue for humans at that time. They depended entirely on the absorbent scope of atmosphere to disrupt the waste naturally. In some of the rural areas or old societies, waste is simply thrown in sea, on open lands, on streets or in backyards. Afterwards, it was burnt and ignited occasionally when the accumulation of methane gas occurs. With intensification, industrialization and urbanization of progression, generation of waste is happening at a rate that cannot be assimilated by the environment anymore (Henry, Yongsheng & Jun 2006). The production of waste may comprises of harmful substances that result in ruining of environment’s life supporting mechanism. The money and effort devoted to the solution of waste issue has greatly expanded. A large number of parties drawn in the mechanism of waste production are encouraged to reconstruct their practices and make alterations in order to reduce the production of waste. All humans are aware of this and they participate in its management, production and removal, and yet simultaneously people struggle to acknowledge the magnitude of its international influence. The most common factor of today’s contemporary environment is garbage. At present, 4 billion tonnes of garbage is generated across the world, maintaining the industry of four hundred and thirty three billion dollars which transform, discard and shift garbage across continents, states and cities (Marshall & Farahbakhsh 2013). The management of waste might give reason for as larger as six percent of employment internationally, and it has been substantiated to have considerable affect on the change of climate. However, garbage is undoubtedly neither glamorous topic nor is diplomats’ bread and butter for global news, scholarly careers, negotiations and reports.  A phenomenal issue is posed by waste for contemporary theory of International Relations in terms of both practice and theory. In terms of practice, garbage along with its politics remain vastly ‘black-boxed’ concealed, quietly moving in and out of people’s neighbourhoods, countries, households and cities. Because of the cross-scalar prevalence of garbage, waste needs analytical skylines beyond typical models of prevailing International Relations (Brunner & Rechberger 2015).

The habit of waste reduction demands people to understand its impacts and then make certain decisions in order to produce less, whether it requires change of consumer behaviour, recycling of materials, or impregnating yard and food waste. This tradition of reduction of waste has not been shown on larger scale yet, demonstrated by litter’s proliferation, specifically Styrofoam and plastic. People are confined to composting, reusing, and reduction of source from which waste is generated. Influencing behavioural alteration for waste reduction will need a comprehension of elements which impact the behaviour of humans with respect to management of waste. A broader range of educational schemes have targeted not to just spread awareness among the individuals of waste challenges, but also to produce new societal codes and domestic traditions about the management of garbage. It has been shown by the research that atmospheric behaviours of public is expanding and maximizing to involve a range of analytical groups in progressed countries, other than merely well educated, urban, and prosperous groups (Laner et al. 2012). Particularly, in countries like Great Britain, Canada and United States programs of recycling have also enhanced, creating ease for people to recycle and hence minimizing the impact of atmospheric concerns. Another innovative process of managing waste is source reduction; this mechanism has got a lot of attraction than recycling, which has turned out to be social tradition in progressed countries (Lehtinen et al. 2013). In the research regarding environmentally-responsible consumerism, it is discovered by Yuan et al. (2012) that common concern about the atmosphere, social elements and more particular concerns regarding the impact of animal life and products on human might be relevant to behaviours of waste reduction and purchase decisions. Attitudes and concerns of environment were suggested by Coelho & De Brito (2012) towards atmosphere are still important about reduction of source, particularly about environmentally-responsible consumerism. Acknowledgment of methods of reducing waste can either encourage people to engage in, or insufficient knowledge can lead to a blockage to the behaviour of waste reduction. Expanding knowledge of the reduction of waste for targeted audience has been viewed as an essential approach of maximizing anticipation of general public in the programs of waste reduction. This aspect is demonstrated in research administered by Ann et al. (2013) who emphasized on approaches to encourage behaviour of reducing waste, in order to redirect thirty percent of stream of waste from dump, through composting, recycling and reduction of source. In order to evaluate the impact of prompting and information approaches on the behaviour of reducing waste in four treatment groups, a survey was conducted. A mixture of economic and environmental reasons was received by the treatment group in order to minimize waste. It represented the most important expansion in self-reported behaviours of reducing waste, in contrast to those treatment groups who received only economic and environmental reasons.  

Various issues regarding waste are settled to municipalities like deficiency of the atmospheric education and deficiency of solid financing. Moreover, waste management of municipal could not be made possible by the potential of municipality personally; there is a need for every stakeholder to work together as a team for the same purpose and to achieve the target. However, accomplishing separation of waste is in the right direction towards sustainability nonetheless various challenges are faced by the municipal. Failures in removal of waste from big cities can be taken as an experience to help the programs of waste separation executed by various other municipalities (Berwickand & Hackbarth 2012). Besides this, there is a need for making a proper design of solution which will help in achieving the desired outcome. In progressed nations, generation of waste per capita maximized about 3 times over last 20 years, coming to the level that 5 to 6 times greater as compared to the level in progressing nations. While, with expansion in quality standards of living and population, generation of waste in progressing nations is expanding quickly, and has increase 2 times in volume in last 10 years. If this situation continues, world might experience a five-fold expansion in the generation of waste by 2025 (De Jaeger et al, 2011). There is a demand of making an integrate strategy where community and private sectors, public work as a unit towards sustainable solutions of managing waste, particularly in the progressing nations where both land and people are suffering by waste. Waste reuse, material recycling and reduction, waste reduction and source minimization are turning out to be significant terms which are vastly used to handle management of solid waste and achieving the general targets (Fakoya & van der Poll 2013).

Municipal committee needs to make a global plan to manage the waste. Public should follow the rules and regulations given to them by the municipal in order to bring change in their respective country regarding management of waste. Everyday thousands of people becomes ill because of drinking unhygienic water, just because of mismanagement of waste from factories and houses. The waste material coming from the factories needs a lot of attention. This waste goes into rivers which ultimately causes serious diseases. Public needs to change the lifestyle of themselves (Lu & Yuan 2013). People do not take the matter of waste seriously as more the people will incline to a high standard living; they will be less worried about the waste (Garrone, Melaciniand & Perego 2014). 

People use to throw a lot of waste. According to an estimate in 2007, public of United States threw out five hundred and seventy billion pound domestic waste. In contrast to other countries, rate of waste generation of United States is alarming. United States is responsible for generating thirty percent of the total waste on the planet earth. Every year, almost 1,650 pounds of waste is thrown by a single person in United States, or nearly 4.6 pounds/person every day, which is doubled the average of 2.7 pounds back in 1960 every single day. Because of the sloppy regulations of government on ever-growing industry of chemicals, each day the used products thrown away of the chemical industries contain more health-affecting and dangerous substances than ever before (Matsuda et al, 2012).

Incineration is involved as a cure for broad variety of solid waste like hazardous waste, hospital and domestic waste. Incineration of waste is generally implemented in last three decades internally and a swift technological progression over last one and a half decade. The vital alteration has been governed by legislation specifically the leading issues is to minimize emission to air (Van Der Wiel, Bossink & Masurel 2012).

The framework of waste management intends the legitimate sequence of the practices of waste management from most desirable choice to least desirable choice. Nowadays, this is the most productive guiding standard of municipal’s management of solid waste across the globe. It presents the categorization of activities of waste management with respect to the efficiency of energy, economic, financial and environmental condition. The influx of the framework of waste management in the era of 1970s was to collapse the disposed-based solution of managing waste, it is argued by scientists that not each and every garbage needs to get buried but few of them shouldn’t be composed excessively, few waste could be recycled, few could be reused but just a few (Abduli & Azimi 2010). 

Source: (Laner et al. 2012)

The target of the framework of managing waste is to fulfil the need of sustainability to the maximum extent. Another, a lessened version of this framework is - reduce, reuse and recycle which has regularly involved in guideline of legislation, public campaigns, university education and producers’ green promotion. It has turned out to be a well-known motto for the strategy of waste management for institutions, organizations and authorities (Su et al. 2010).

 

Conclusion

In the end, it can be concluded that the mundane actions taken by people in their everyday life for the reduction of waste are not going to help them in making their country clean from the waste and hence various kinds of diseases will keep on growing. There is a need of making separate departments for managing waste in every city of a country and seminars should be conducted in order to spread awareness among the people regarding the ways to manage waste of their houses and offices

 

 

 

References

Abduli, M A & Azimi, E 2010, ‘Municipal waste reduction potential and related strategies in Tehran’, International Journal of Environmental Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp.901-912.

 

Ann, TW, Poon, CS, Wong, A, Yip, R & Jaillon, L 2013, 'Impact of construction waste disposal charging scheme on work practices at construction sites in Hong Kong', Waste Management, vol 33, no. 1, pp. 138-146.

 

 

Berwick, D M & Hackbarth, A D 2012, ‘Eliminating waste in US health care’, Jama, vol. 14, no. 307, pp.1513-1516.

 

Brunner, PH & Rechberger, H 2015, 'Waste to energy–key element for sustainable waste management', Waste Management, vol 37, pp. 3-12.

 

Coelho, A & De Brito, J 2012, 'Influence of construction and demolition waste management on the environmental impact of buildings', Waste Management, vol 32, no. 3, pp. 532-541.

 

 

De Jaeger, S, Eyckmans, J, Rogge, N & Van Puyenbroeck, T 2011, ‘Wasteful waste-reducing policies? The impact of waste reduction policy instruments on collection and processing costs of municipal solid waste’, Waste Management, vol. 7, no, 31, pp.1429-1440.

 

Fakoya, M B & van der Poll, H M 2013, ‘Integrating ERP and MFCA systems for improved waste-reduction decisions in a brewery in South Africa’, Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 40, pp.136-140.

 

Garrone, P, Melacini, M & Perego, A 2014, ‘Opening the black box of food waste reduction’, Food policy, vol. 1, no. 46, pp.129-139.

 

Henry, RK, Yongsheng, Z & Jun, D 2006, 'Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing countries–Kenyan case study', Waste Management, vol 26, no. 1, pp. 92-100.

 

 

Jaillon, L, Poon, C S & Chiang, Y H 2009, ‘Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong’, Waste Management, vol. 1, no. 29, pp.309-320.

 

Laner, D, Crest, M, Scharff, H, Morris, JW & Barlaz, MA 2012, 'A review of approaches for the long-term management of municipal solid waste landfills', Waste Management, vol 32, no. 3, pp. 498-512.

 

Lehtinen, J, Tolvanen, O, Nivukoski, U, Veijanen, A & Hänninen, K 2013, 'Occupational hygiene in terms of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and bioaerosols at two solid waste management plants in Finland', Waste Management, vol 33, no. 4, pp. 964-973.

 

 

Lu, W & Yuan, H 2013, ‘Investigating waste reduction potential in the upstream processes of offshore prefabrication construction’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 1, no. 28, pp.804-811.

 

Marshall, RE & Farahbakhsh, K 2013, 'Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries', Waste Management, vol 33, no. 4, pp. 988-1003.

 

Matsuda, T, Yano, J, Hirai, Y & Sakai, S I 2012, ‘Life-cycle greenhouse gas inventory analysis of household waste management and food waste reduction activities in Kyoto, Japan’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 6, no. 17, pp.743-752.

 

Sharholy, M, Ahmad, K, Mahmood, G & Trivedi, RC 2008, 'Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities–A review', Waste Management, vol 28, no. 2, pp. 459-467.

 

Strengers, Y 2011, ‘Negotiating everyday life: The role of energy and water consumption feedback’, Journal of Consumer Culture, vol 3, no. 11, pp.319-338.

 

Su, J P, Hung, M L, Chao, C W & Ma, H W 2010, ‘Applying multi-criteria decision-making to improve the waste reduction policy in Taiwan’, Waste Management & Research, vol. 1, no.  28, pp.20-28.

 

Van Der Wiel, A, Bossink, B & Masurel, E 2012, ‘Reverse logistics for waste reduction in cradle-to-cradle-oriented firms: waste management strategies in the Dutch metal industry’, International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 2, no. 60, pp.96-113.

 

Yuan, H, Chini, AR, Lu, Y & Shen, L 2012, ' A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste', Waste management, vol 32, no. 3, pp. 521-531.

 

 

 

 

 


Get An Instant Quote

rev

Our Service Portfolio

jb

Want To Place An Order Quickly?

Then shoot us a message on Whatsapp, WeChat or Gmail. We are available 24/7 to assist you.

whatsapp

Grab The Following Features Right Now

Do not panic, you are at the right place

jb

Visit Our writting services page to get all the details and guidence on availing our assiatance service.

Get 20% Discount, Now
£19 £14/ Per Page
14 days delivery time

Now! moonlight your way to A+ grade academic success. Get the high-quality work - or your money back.

ORDER TODAY!

Our experts are ready to assist you, call us to get a free quote or order now to get succeed in your academics writing.

Get a Free Quote Order Now