Research Study: Factors Causing Cannabis Use

Print   

25 Jan 2018

Disclaimer:
This essay has been written and submitted by students and is not an example of our work. Please click this link to view samples of our professional work witten by our professional essay writers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of EssayCompany.

Factors Leading towards cannabis use and what can be done about them: A study carried out in local transport drivers of district Peshawar, Pakistan.

 

The problem of drug trafficking represents a crippling facet of reality in Pakistan that is affecting 34% of the country’s population in terms of having problems with drug usage, and or abuse. The district of Peshawar, which lies near the Khyber Pass access to Afghanistan, places that region at the centre of trafficking activity that has made illicit drugs readily available to the populace at highly affordable prices due to the proximity of heavy drug activity. Drug use is an international problem, one that increasingly is focusing on Pakistan as a result of it being in the center of the most active drug producing regions in the world. As such, the country has developed a serious internal problem in that its citizens have become swept up in the production, trafficking as well as use of drugs. The preceding are activities that undermine the nation’s economy as the money flows are black market, and one which is costing the country its most valuable resource, is people, who are in ever increasing numbers being wasted as well as suffering from the ravages of drug use, and addiction.

The purpose, and role of government represent a complex issue that in its own right deserves a study onto itself. In the context of the examination thus identified, a summary of this complex relationship shall be put forth as it is an integral aspect of the preceding. Reus-Smit (1999, p. 129) tells us that:

“The moral purpose of the modern state thus entailed a new principle of procedural justice—legislative justice. This principle prescribes two precepts of rule determination: first, that only those subject to the rules have the right to define them and, second, that the rules of society must apply equally to all citizens, in all like cases. Both precepts were enshrined in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, which states that “[l]aw is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes.””

Rousseau provides further amplification of the purpose of government as he held “…that the laws legislated by the people or their representatives must apply equally to all citizens in all like cases. “Every authentic act of the general will,” he writes, “favors all citizens equally, so that the sovereign, knows only the body of the nation and makes no distinctions between any of those who compose it” (Reus-Smit (1999, p. 130). Schmidtz (1991, p. 10) cites Hume (1978, p. 539) who states:

“…the beauty of the state is not that it results from a collective decision but rather that it makes collective decisions unnecessary. People no longer need to come to an agreement about what is in their collective interest, for magistrates "need consult no body but themselves to form any scheme for the promoting of that interest.... Thus, bridges are built; harbours open'd; ramparts rais'd; canals form'd; fleets equip'd; and armies disciplin'd; every where, by the care o government , which, tho' compos'd of men subject to all human infirmities, becomes, by one of the finest and most subtle inventions imaginable, a composition, that is, in some measure, exempted from all these infirmities”

The foregoing tells us that government exists to look after, and for our best interests for the collective good. Thus the drug problem represents an issue that is not in the best interests of the people, and is government’s responsibility to confront and resolve. Thus, the reduction of drug use, and the reduction of drug production, and trafficking are priorities that the country needs to address in order to safeguard the future of its citizens, as well as return the country’s economic healths and vitality. This examination shall delve into the forgoing in the context of the “Factors Leading towards cannabis use and what can be done about them: A study carried out in local transport drivers of district Peshawar, Pakistan.”

The problem of drug use is a global phenomenon, one that is especially pervasive in Pakistan. The country’s proximity to Afghanistan, which ranks as one of the top drug producing nations on the globe, coupled with the high drug productive capabilities of Pakistan, and the high poverty levels in the Peshawar region, makes for the perfect breeding grounds for addiction. With in excess of 4 million drug users in Pakistan, representing one of the highest per user percentages internationally, the scope of the problem with respect to production, trafficking, and addiction represent a triple edged sword that few countries are faced with. The foregoing, has been aided by corruption in governmental posts as well as the infiltration of regional tribal leaders who either traffic in, or have interests in this trade, into political positions further complicating the task of control and reduction.

  1. Justification for the study

The international initiative to reduce drug user, and availability in all countries, with emphasis on the nations of the United States, European Union member states, and other destination points has been undertaken to lessen the potential exposure to drugs on the part of adolescents, and young adults as well as to reduce crime. The flow of drugs fuels the coffers of organized crime amounting to sums in the billions of euros that is fed by the commission of petty crimes, murders, and other societal acts resulting from addiction, procurement, and supply at all levels in the matrix. The costs in terms of humanity, resources, and suffering are almost incalculable. The reduction of drug flow as well as usage represents a solution that benefits all but those who are reaping huge profits from its movement, and sale.

  1. Problem Identification

In equating the problem as well as ramifications of the factors leading toward the use of cannabis, and what actions can be taken to reduce the foregoing, various approaches, and methodologies have been put forth by nations, and international organizations such as the United Nations to address this issue. The two main schools of thought in attempting to resolve this conundrum are the curtailing of supply as a means to limit drug availability along with punitive measures for suppliers and users, and the education of users, and potential users to the dangers of drug use, and providing them with a means to obtain treatment. The foregoing represents the tactics of the two main destination points, the United States, and the member states of the European Union, respectively. These are the external forces acting upon Pakistan in addition to the drug supply passing through the country from Afghanistan as well as the growth, and production of drugs within the country that makes heroin, cocaine and cannabis freely and readily available to the residents of Peshawar. It is one of the main through routes for the distribution of drugs.

The preceding has created an immense problem for the government of Pakistan to implement methods to resolve these issues, and address the needs of its populace in treating as well as stemming drug usage for their own well being.

  1. Aim of the dissertation

The aim of this examination is to explore as well as uncover the factors leading to drug usage in the Peshawar district, its effects on the populace, and what steps, methodologies, and procedures can or should be implemented to stem its growth, and effect a reduction that is sustainable.

  1. Specific Objectives

The objectives are represented by the following:

  1. To identify factors leading to the use of cannabis by local transport drivers in district Peshawar.
  2. To identify ways to tackle factors that lead towards cannabis use by local transport drivers.
  3. To provide recommendations to deal with the issue of cannabis use by local transport drivers of district Peshawar.
  1. Output of the study

This facet of the study is to provide a background of information on the issue that provides an informational basis via which to better understand the forces acting on drug usage in Peshawar from an internal as well as external perspective to reach a recommendation that provides a means to reduce drug usage.

  1. Stakeholders/target audience

The stakeholders in this examination are represented by the destination states for the illicit drugs grown, cultivated, and produced in the region that is trafficked as well as the local residents who have been impacted directly by this activity to the point whereby Pakistan has one of the highest percentage rates of drug users in the international community. The concentration of drug activity in Peshawar has thus directly affected its residents, and is taking the future away from an entire generation that is caught in the web of illicit drugs. The target audiences represented by this examination are those parties involved in seeking a means to reduce drug use in the district, on a national as well as international level.

  1. Methodology

The methodology to be utilized in this examination shall be based upon secondary sources utilizing a broad cross section of ideas, studies, approaches, and actual drug reduction strategies taken from key countries, and regions internationally. The sources will utilise books, journals, articles, and the Internet to gain as broad a perspective as possible that is limited by the amount of data as well as time constraints. The limitations are a result of the preceding as some potentially enlightening information could possibility be overlooked, and or not obtained as a result of the amount of data available. Research forms the core of this examination as it will provide the information from which specific aspects will be gleaned that relate to the study. Anderson (1998, p. 27) states that.

“Researchis a dynamic activity that travels a long and winding trail from start to finish. It is not a single event, rather, the act of doing research is a process. And like instructional design, evaluation, decision-making and planning, the research cycle has a set of basic elements that interrelate and interact with each other”

He adds that (Anderson, 1998, p. 27):

“All research involves certain common elements such as defining the questions, reviewing the literature, planning the methodology, collecting and analyzing data, and disseminating findings. At first glance, this may seem like a rather logical, straightforward process, but it is not. Research is dynamic, it evolves as activities unfold and the elements of the research process interact and impact on one another. Time is required to allow research questions to develop, literature to be searched, data to be collected, interpreted and analyzed, and findings disseminated.”

Chapter 2 – Problem Analysis

The examination of the impact of cannabis use on local transport drivers of the Peshawar district in Pakistan immediately provides a visual as well as mental signal as to the potentially dangerous ramifications. Cannabis is a hypnotic drug derived from a plant which has intoxicant qualities that have some uses in medicine, but is better known for is use as a recreational drug where it generates a considerable range of side effects that impact differing people in varied manners. Mikuriya (1969, p. 904) listed the following potential therapeutic uses:

  • analgesic and hypnotic,
  • as an appetite stimulant,
  • antiepileptic, antispasmodic,
  • as an aid in the prevention as well as interruption of migraines and tic douloureux,
  • as an antidepressant as well as tranquilizer,
  • as a psychotherapeutic aid,
  • antiasthmatic,
  • in the acceleration of childbirth (oxytoxic),
  • as a topical anesthetic,
  • in certain uses as an agent that facilitates patient withdrawal from additions to opiates and alcohol, and
  • as an antibiotic

In terms of the context of this examination concerning the factors that lead to the use of cannabis, and what can be done about the situation, utilizing the context of transport drivers in Peshawar Pakistan, the focus is thus on the user side of the equation in terms of cannabis as a recreational drug. In that context studies, and analysis by a broad number of researchers as well as the documentation found in journals, books, and articles clearly point out through conclusive as well as subjective findings that cannabis has a broad number of impairment qualities that can manifest themselves. Key to that understanding is the fact that these manifestations can occur in differing degrees of intensity as well as singular, and or multiple combinations in the user, who may or may not be aware of these effects. The preceding makes the use of this drug even more dangerous for individuals engaged in the operation of machinery, and in particular trucks.

The Center on International Cooperation (2004) provided an overview of the problem in stating that Pakistan is known for governmental corruption that plays a part in the drug trafficking that occurs within its borders. The proximity of Peshawar to the border of Afghanistan as well as its own growing. and related drug production activities makes that district a den for drug use as a result of its ease of availability. and low price. Contributing to the problem is the lack of employment opportunities that has created a large number of individuals living in poverty. The International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (2006) states that low income, lack of economic opportunities, and proximity to the availability of drugs makes for high usage. The forgoing, coupled with the fact that cannabis is a social, and or recreational drug that does not have the stigma of heroin, and cocaine, yet does have many of their same qualities, creates an environment ripe for addiction. The foregoing is demonstrated by the fact that after to Iran, Pakistan has the highest percentage of drugs users in the world (International Crisis Group, 2001).

Factors that lead to the use of cannabis, in addition to the broad circumstantial aspects thus far mentioned, are peer pressure, and use as well as social contexts (Ausubel, 1969, p. 17), and the lack of education, opportunities, and outlets for social and recreational pursuits, and information on the dangerous effects of cannabis use (Kahn, 2002). In terms of transport drivers, their jobs entail repetitive, monotonous, low paying work that leaves plenty of time for mental wandering, boredom, and association with individuals who are drug users as well as being young of age. That age group is therefore highly prone to peer pressure, thus throwing them into a circle of high potential usage (IRIN, 2006). All of the preceding represents unmistakable contributing factors that make it extremely difficult to escape falling into drug use.

In delving into the examination of the problem a ‘problem tree’ is a useful tool in analyzing situations as it aids in the identification of major problems in the examination, along with the causal relationships (Robertson, 2001. p. 32). In applying this methodology to the preceding examination, the following analysis of the factors equated with the problem become evident.

Figure 1 – Problem Tree Analysis of Factors Leading to

Cannabis Use and What Can be Done About Them:

A Study Carried Out in Local Transport Drivers

of the Peshawar District in Pakistan

The preceding analysis shall thus form the matrix upon which this examination will focus.

Chapter 3 – Literature Review

Cannabis sativa was labeled by Linnaeus in 1753 is known by many names, the most popular, and universally understood being marihuana, and weed (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 1). Known for medicinal as well as being a euphoriant, the first recorded use of cannabis is “…found in the Herbal, an ancient equivalent of the U.S. Pharmacopoeia, written about 400 to 500 B.C. “ (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 1). Also known as ‘Indian Hemp’, it is a stout, bushy, branching plant whose height varies from 5 to 15 feet in height, and is an old crop that has been grown in China as well as Asia for centuries (Hill, 1952, p. 28). In terms of products, Indian hemp is utilized “…for ropes, twine, carpets, sailcloth, yacht cordage, binder twine, sacks, bags, and webbing” as well as “Hemp waste, and the woody fibers of the stem are sometimes used in making paper” (Hill, 1952, p. 29). In addition “The seeds contain an oil that is useful in the soap and paint industries as a substitute for linseed oil” (Hill, 1952, p. 29).

Medicinally, “Cannabis has long been used as an indigenous medicine in the south of Africa, South America, Turkey, Egypt, and many areas of Asia including India, the Malays, Burma, and Siam” (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 218). Despite the Western notion of cannabis as simply an intoxicant, there is documented evidence of its beneficial use in medicinal remedies. There is a large body of evidence from the Orient on the use of cannabis in medical applications (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 219). In studies conducted by Dr, W.B. O’Shaughnessy in 1839, who at the time was thirty-three and an “… assistant surgeon and professor of chemistry at the Medical College of Calcutta …”, he experimented on “…patients suffering from rabies, rheumatism, epilepsy, and tetanus” (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 219). O’Shaughnessy reported “ … anticonvulsant properties of the previously untried materia medica, expressed his "belief that in Hemp the profession has gained an anti-convulsive remedy of the greatest value” (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 219). O’Shaughnessy’s research led further investigation by Dr. R. M’Meens for “…tetanus, neuralgia, the arrest of uterine hemorrhage, as an analgesic during labor, in dysmenorrhoea, convulsions, the pain of rheumatism, asthma, postpartum psychoses, gonorrhea, and chronic bronchitis” (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 219). Dr. M’Meens studies and reports resulted in cannabis being assigned (M’Meens, 1860, pp. 94-95):

"a place among the so called hypnotic medicines next to opium; its effects are less intense, and the secretions are not so much suppressed by it. Digestion is not disturbed; the appetite rather increased; . . . The whole effect of hemp being less violent, and producing a more natural sleep, without interfering with the actions of the internal organs, it is certainly often preferable to opium, although it is not equal to that drug in strength and reliability."

M’Meens also found that cannabis had use as a sedative among other medicinal purposes (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 220). Dr. Hare in 1887 noted that the use of cannabis “…quieting restlessness and anxiety, and by turning the mind of the patient to other channels. . . . Under these circumstances, the patient, whose most painful symptom has been mental trepidation, may become more happy or even hilarious” (Hare, 1887, p. 225-226). However, the Tax Act of 1937 “…completed its medical demise, and it was removed from the U.S. Pharmacopoeia and National Formulary in 1941” (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 218).

Modern day medical findings see its proponents suggesting the legalisation of marijuana in terms of its medicinal uses (Earlywine, 2002, p. 167). Naturally, the preceding views have sparked a number of debates. It has been found that “Smoked cannabis clearly helps some problems and may cost less than other medications”, and that “Synthetic cannabinoids can also alleviate symptoms of many disorders” (Earlywine, 2002, p. 167). G.T. Stockings, a medical researcher, administered a synthetic cannabis preparation to fifty depressive patients, and thirty-six showed definitive improvement (Stockings, 1947, pp. 918-922). Mikuriya (1969, p. 904) in reviewing the medical evidence as well as literature listed the potential and possible therapeutic uses of cannabis:

  • analgesic and hypnotic,
  • as an appetite stimulant,
  • antiepileptic, antispasmodic,
  • as an aid in the prevention as well as interruption of migraines and tic douloureux,
  • as an antidepressant as well as tranquilizer,
  • as a psychotherapeutic aid,
  • antiasthmatic,
  • in the acceleration of childbirth (oxytoxic),
  • as a topical anesthetic,
  • in certain uses as an agent that facilitates patient withdrawal from additions to opiates and alcohol, and
  • as an antibiotic

The current position of organized medicine in the United States is that cannabis has been condemned as medically worthless, and even dangerous (Grinspoon, 1971, p. 226). In fact the members of the Committee on Legislative Activities of the American Medical Association in 1937, in protesting the Marihuana Tax Act, stated (Cary, 1937, pp. 2214-2215):

"There is positively no evidence to indicate the abuse of cannabis as a medicinal agent or to show that its medicinal use is leading to the development of cannabis addiction. Cannabis at the present time is slightly used for medicinal purposes, but it would seem worthwhile to maintain its status as a medicinal agent for such purposes as it now has. There is a possibility that a restudy of the drug by modern means may show other advantages to be derived from its medicinal use. "Your committee also recognizes that in the Border States the extensive use of the marihuana weed by a certain type of people would be hard to control that in the Border States the extensive use of the marihuana weed by a certain type of people would be hard to control”

In 1967 a position paper written in the Journal of the American Medical Association stated “Cannabis (marihuana) has no known use in medical practice in most countries of the world, including the United States” (Council on Mental Health and Committee on Legislative Activities and Drug Dependence, 1967, p. 1181). The factual evidence however points to otherwise as a classified undertaking by the United States Department of Defence in the United States that suggests the utilisation of cannabis compounds might be useful for (Culliton, 1970, p. 105):

  1. analgesics
  2. blood pressure reduction, and
  3. psychopharmacotherapeutic agents

The limited utilization position of the United States in the uses of marijuana for medical purposes is outdated, according to global practices. The only uses legally approved in the United States are in California, and Arizona for medical purposes as approved by a physician, primarily for glaucoma, and high blood pressure (Christenson, 2004). Research conducted at the Complutense University in Madrid revealed that components contained in marijuana that were derived from the plant inhibited the growth of cancerous brain tumours (Annie Appleseed Project, 2007). The findings of that study were published in the journal of the American Association of Cancer Research. Other research and studies have also found that “…cannabis restricts the blood supply to Gliobastoma multiforme tumours …”, which is an aggressive brain tumour (Annie Appleseed Project, 2007). The foregoing study which was initiated in the United States in 1974, and then subsequent left unfounded was picked up by the Complutense University Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology in 1998 were it was “…discovered that THC could selectively induce programme cell death in brain tumours without affecting healthy cells” (Annie Appleseed Project, 2007).

In addition, new research and studies have uncovered what other cultures, notably Asian, have known for decades, that marijuana in certain uses does have value as a medicine. In a recent study conducted at the University of California, it was “…found that smoked marijuana was effective at relieving the extreme pain of a debilitating condition known as peripheral neuropathy … (as well as potentially beneficial uses for) … cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, arthritis and other debilitating illnesses.” (International Herald Tribune, 2007). The foregoing positive uses of cannabis as well as the wide spread use in Asia on an historical basis for medical purposes underlines the rationales for providing the broad based background information which was utilized to set the context that the initial foundational uses of cannabis in that region on an historical basis served a different purpose from its present. That background is important in understanding that the mental, and historical context in terms of cannabis in the Asian region differed greatly from the policy, and views of the United States, and Europe that impose criminal penalties that have spread to other regions, including Asia as the over riding policy that deals with usage today.

In equating the use as well as regional context regarding Pakistan and cannabis, it is important to understand that the country borders China, Tajikistan, and Afghanistan. The preceding is important in that Afghanistan is “… the principle opium supplier to heroin and morphine base laboratories located in Pakistan …”, Tajikistan as well as Turkey (Center on International Cooperation, 2004). The drug industry provides a livelihood for many of the poor of Afghanistan as well as Tajikistan, and the Peshawar district (Center on International Cooperation, 2004). The governmental administration in Pakistan has corrupt elements, subject to the payment of funds to ease controls, and police interference, thus keeping the market fluid (Khan and Wadud, 2001). With Peshawar located extremely close to the Afghanistan border, and Khyber Pass, it is the center of drug trafficking, and thus also fosters a drug supportive culture. The significance of the preceding is that the underlying hard drug culture fosters softer drugs use, cannabis, as more acceptable and a lighter form of involvement (United States Department of State, 2006). Cannabis is cultivated as well as grows wild in the region, thus making its availability easy for any resident (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2007).

Figure 1 – Map of Pakistan

(unique-century, 2007)

0

The significance of the medicinal historical background as well as the drug industry trade, and the overall poverty of the region set the conditions for drug use among the populace as well, important factors in the understanding of motivations for use, and conditions that drag individuals into use. Important in this understanding is that Afghanistan’s drug trafficking represents an estimated one-third of the overall Gross Domestic Product, which is fostered by a corruption government administration (United States Department of State, 2006). The region itself is also subject to the drug trade as a result of the land expanses of land, and the huge number of individuals living at, and below the poverty line. In addition to the indicated countries, drugs form a big part of the economies of Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka (Center on International Cooperation, 2004). The heavy undercurrent of drugs, opium, heroin, and thus cannabis represents a lure for a means out of poverty as well as a manner in which a large number of the populace are exposed to drugs at an early age.

Pakistan itself traffics in drugs as well as cultivates opium, and is a major transit country for hashish and opiates from Afghanistan (Center on International Cooperation, 2004). The country also has unconfirmed labs, and facilities along with an estimated 3 to 5 million addicts. Drug traffickers in Pakistan move product from Afghanistan to Turkey by land, through Iran as well as by sea. The foregoing is also an important consideration in the use of cannabis as a softer drug that is less addictive, and more importantly is affordable as a hard drug substitute in terms of poor economic opportunities as well as physical isolation for Pakistanis (International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, 2006). In the Asian region, cannabis is seen as an herb more than a drug. Unlike hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine, cannabis is seen as a social and recreational drug. It is easily grown in almost any type of conditions, and the climate in Pakistan is particularly suited to cultivation. It is important to mention that cannabis in today’s form differs from their culture of the 1960’s and 70’s in that it has been cross bred, and its potency has increased dramatically, estimated by 20 times (Drug Addiction & Advice Project, 2007). The last factor, increased potency has changed the dynamics of cannabis to one that borders on the additive qualities of cocaine.

Cannabis is a mood-altering drug, which represents one of the key rationales for its use among the improvised peoples of Peshawar as it provides an increased internal feeling of well being and happiness, increases laughter, and also heightens one’s appetite. The preceding are factors in the hard life of poorer Peshawar residents as they have little to be happy about. Cannabis, like alcohol helps people to relax, and in many instances aids them in thinking that it helps them to cope with their problems (Department of Human Services, 2002).

3.1 Actions Against Cannabis

The global drug problem has been the subject of immense study as well as policies. A key development that has influenced the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances has been the Inter-American Commission on Drug Policy (Smith, 1992, p. 16). After years of study, the Commission issued a policy report in 1991 that advised that the means to control, and thus reduce global drug use rested in understanding the following dynamics (Smith, 1992, p. 17):

“1). Demand, not supply, is the most powerful force underlying the market for illicit drugs;

2). drugs and drug trafficking present a multilateral challenge, and nations of the hemisphere must develop a coordinated, multilateral response; and

3) efforts and resources should be devoted to strategies that are truly effective. As a practical, political matter, legalization (in any form) does not offer a plausible choice”

The preceding led to the formation of an international consensus against the trafficking of drugs, the most noteworthy being the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Smith, 1992, p. 17). The U.N. Convention focused upon giving force to the supply sided recommendations and “…committed signatories to share law enforcement evidence and provide mutual legal assistance, seize drug-related assets, criminalize money laundering and relax bank secrecy laws, extradite individuals charged with drug law violations, control shipment of precursor and essential chemicals, and redouble crop eradication and reduction efforts” (U.S. Bureau of Justice, 1990, p. 102). As such, the 1988 U.N. Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances marked a significant move forward in extending existing international drug controls, however, it was marred by new directions in the evolution of the global drug trade that had taken place while these initiatives were being devised.

In order to understand the dynamics represented by international drug trafficking, and the subsequent efforts to implement policies to bring it under control, one must have an understanding of the climate in which it operates. Today’s international market in drugs “…is the product of a complex evolutionary process that began in the early years of this century” (Stares, 1996, p. 15). Historically, “…mind-altering drugs have been traded and consumed since antiquity, it was not until the twentieth century that this activity gained its distinctly illicit character” (Stares, 1996, p. 15). Public alarm and concern over the growing drug problem prompted governments, particularly the United States and the EU to take steps whereby “Through a series of international conventions buttressed by domestic laws, the production, sale, and consumption of a wide range of drugs for anything other than medical and scientific purposes were progressively prohibited around the world” (Stares, 1996, p. 15). The sanctions taken under the 1988 U.N. Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances failed to account for the growing strength of well organised and financed criminal organizations in the trafficking of drugs as a result of the profits generated. In addition, economies have and are playing a major role in the trafficking of drugs as residents in the growing nations have few opportunities, are relatively uneducated, and have become expendable pawns by criminal organisations that have an almost unlimited supply of locales, people, and means to grow, cultivate and move drugs on a scale that entails billions of dollars (Stares, 1996, p. 47).

The scale of the problem has forced international cooperation that is hampered in part by corrupt officials in various governmental levels in the South American and Asian regions that represent the principle suppliers to the United States and Europe. Spearheading the international war on drugs is the United States along with Europe, which have used their influence, along with the damaging effects of drugs and the money it brings to international criminal organizations to spur action on the part of the United Nations. Under that auspices, the United Nations has three conventions relating to drug matters that are active (Drug Policy Alliance, 2007). The preceding are represented by (Drug Policy Alliance, 2007):

  1. The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by protocol in 1972.
  2. The Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971, and
  3. The United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988

The aforementioned U.N. drug policies represented what is termed the ‘prohibitionist’ approach that have grown out of the 1912 Hague opium convention. The date of the preceding provides insight as to why Krajewski (1998) states that U.N. drug policies are perceived as being “… extremely conservative …” thus representing a serious obstacle in terms of the rationalization of present drug policies as well as making it difficult to adopt solutions concerning dependency on drugs as well as criminal charges on use and harm reduction strategies. Given the 1912 Hague opium convention as the underpinning for present U.N. policies, the preceding has merit. Krajewskie (1998) aptly points out that the eradication of the drug problem is not possible, thus society as a whole is going to have to understand and adjust to some sort of cohabitation level that is acceptable in terms of its depth. This means reducing usage to levels substantially below present rates. The preceding understanding is important in equating the different strategies and approaches that have and are being utilised in the international context to deal with different factors of cannabis use, primarily those leading up to its consumption in the first place.

Unfortunately, the depth and inculcation of cannabis use is so deep in the context of international cultures, as a result of historical contexts as well as perceived harmlessness, that reversing this notion represents looking at reducing the potential for trial by new users as the most logical step, in that present users are harder to influence in terms of behaviour patterns. The preceding represents the methodology adopted by Australia (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). In the ‘Forward’ to the document produced by the Commonwealth of Australia (2003), titled “Cannabis and Consequences”, it states that the government “… is committed to supporting national efforts to reduce harm caused by drugs in our society”. At the forefront of this initiative is the strategy to educate students as well as assist teachers on their working with pupils to advise them of the dangers as well as issues associated with the use of cannabis (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). The core of this approach is based upon the fact that teachers occupy a valuable role in society in that they have daily contact as well as considerable influence. In this capacity, they have the ability to instruct, influence and more importantly open up the lines of communication to students as to the consequences and dangers of cannabis use, and its potential path to hard drugs.

In addition to utilizing teachers as a resource through special programs, the government of Australia has produced a CD-ROM and Informational Booklet for parents that highlights a broad range of the intended as well as unintended consequences related to the use of cannabis (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). The benefit of the preceding is that this information is available not only in schools, but in homes as well, thus aiding parents in instructing their children, as well as educating them of the signs and circumstances preceding and during cannabis use and introduction to their children. The ‘Cannabis and Consequences’ kit prepared by the government consists of (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003):

  • a booklet prepared for teacher instructional use,
  • an introduction,
  • details on the program and resource and how it can be utilised,
  • a framework for utilisation in education,
  • research and current facts,
  • a segment representing common questions about cannabis,
  • a 24 activity set action Plan for classroom use,
  • a website guide in multimedia format,
  • an educational video titled ‘Wasted: Cannabis and Consequences’ that is eight minutes long, and.,
  • a brochure and information sheet prepared for parents.

The concept behind this initiative is to engage students in varied research, discussion and instructional time whereby they become acquainted with the dangers and misconceptions of cannabis through their own efforts, as well as classroom discussion and involvement as opposed to learning about cannabis through friends and trial (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). This same approach, in differing contexts, and formats is used in the Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland through a scientific conference to explore ways in which to define the damaging effects of cannabis use to make such information understandable, and thus available for use in varied programs aimed at educating the public (Ministry of Public Health of Belgium, 2002). In the United States, the Department of Health and Human Services (2003) advocates programs to educate children and families under ‘Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in community based resource centres, Head Start programs, educational campaigns utilizing broadcast media, Club Drugs and educational resources.

In Europe, one of the key educational resource programs is represented by the ‘Foundation for a Drug Free Europe’ that collaborates with local, national as well as institutions for the purpose of coordinating and generating drugs prevention educational programs and campaigns (Foundation for a Drug Free Europe, 2005). In understanding the social, personal as well as educational aspects of drugs, many countries in Europe have shifted their approach to the treatment as opposed to arrest mode in terms of drugs (Ford, 2001). The preceding represents a ‘harm reduction policy’ that advocates treatment as opposed to arrest for individuals found with small amounts of cannabis on their person (Ford, 2001). The underlying principle is that these individuals be treated as addicts as opposed to criminals, and that the drugs problem among users is a public health problem rather than a law and order one (Ford, 2001). Nicoline van der Arend, who is an advisor to the Minister of Justice in the Holland, states that if these minor users are not arrested and put into prison, the idea is that they will thus be willing to take and use treatment (Ford, 2001).

This pioneering approach is completely opposite of the United States, which advocates an all out war on drugs. The statistics are proving the American tactic to be wrong in that in Holland, where small amounts of cannabis have been permitted for over 25 years, and sold in coffee shops, as well as taxed, cannabis use is only impacted 18% of the population, as opposed to 33% in the United States. In Holland, drug possession is against the law, technically, however the government has elected not to prosecute small amounts of possession setting its goals on dealers and suppliers instead (Ford, 2001). The Dutch approach, concerning permitting small amounts of cannabis, has also been adopted by Belgium as well as Britain, Spain, Germany, and Italy (Ford, 2001). In France, the police do not prosecute an estimated 95 per cent of possession instances (Ford, 2001). The objective in Sweden as well as Greece is a drug free society, thus possession in any amount is prosecuted (Ford, 2001).

The argument for the harm reduction approach is supported in a study conducted in Britain under the possession arrest methodology, drug use has increased steadily in the 14 to 15 age group from 4 per cent in 1969 to 15 percent in 1989 (May et al, 2002, p. 2). Nationally in the United Kingdom, the trend in terms of cannabis use in the under 35 age group has escalated from 6 to 7 per cent in the beginning of 1980 “… to 19 per cent in 2000 …” (May et al, 2002, p. 2). The study found that “most cannabis use is intermittent …” and is also controlled, posing “… few short term risks to users” (May et al, 2002, p. 2). The study, in consort with the Dutch harm reduction strategy, reported that approximately one in seven were cautioned, and or convicted for possession (May et al, 2002, p. 2).

Tullis (1995, p. 7) advises that an examination of drugs needs to entail aspects such as “…where production, trafficking, and consumption are occur- ring and under what circumstances. In understanding the preceding, it is important to understand that drugs “…whether produced, consumed, or trafficked—and crime walk hand in hand” (Tullis, 1995, p. 7). The knowledge concerning consumption, as represented by their psychopharmacological properties, meaning how they impact upon pleasure, mood, and or motor senses, along with the natures of a specific society, its culture and “…how traffickers choose—or are permitted—to operate in such cultures and societies” (Tullis, 1995, p. 7). The interesting factor brought up by Tullis (1995, p. 7), is that drug control laws create the conditions for illegal consumption, thereby creating a global black market whereby large sums of money are generated. Tullis (1995, p. 7) adds that “Applying and avoiding the law in relationship to addiction, abuse, and pleasure seeking from drugs' psychopharmacological properties appear to induce most drug-related criminal behavior”. A key facet in the use of “…drugs have in common is that they affect the user's central nervous system (CNS), produce a euphoric state, and in some cases cause physical and or psychological dependency” (Lee, 2004, p. 17).

It is this growing physical dependence that fosters repeated use and thus “…the reliance on a particular substance in order to function normally, and its continued use is required to prevent withdrawal symptoms” (Lee, 2004, p. 17). Psychological dependence represents when one has “…a compulsion to use a particular substance for its pleasurable effects” (Lee, 2004, p. 17). Lee (2004, p. 17) tells us that “Most drugs of abuse can be categorized as being depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, or inhalants. There are drugs that have medical purposes, but have a high risk of abuse due to their euphoric effects”. Cannabis is usually smoked in loosely rolled cigarettes, and is readily available at affordable pricing, making it useable by all segments of society, regardless of economic conditions. It grows freely in Pakistan that thus places it in the reach of local residents as opposed to cocaine and heroin that must be processed. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) represents the plant’s active ingredient, along with other toxins as well as cancer causing chemicals that remain stored in the body’s fat cells for up to seven months (Lee, 2004, p. 43). Cannabis creates the same health related problems as cigarette smoking, in that it causes emphysema, bronchitis, and bronchial asthma (Lee, 2004, p. 44). “Hashish is the THC-rich resinous secretion of the cannabis plant that is collected, dried, and compressed into plates …” (Lee, 2004, p. 46). Pakistan, Turkey, Morocco and Lebanon are the largest producers of hashish, which can be produced “…from massive fields of typically low percentage THC …” cannabis plants (Lee, 2004, p. 46).

It is trafficked in Pakistan to the Macron coast and then shipped out of the country via ships and smaller craft, and as a result of it being a compressed and more potent version of cannabis, it carries a higher profit margin (Lee, 2004, p. 47). Pakistan, along with Afghanistan are the largest producers of hashish that is shipped to every major market in the world (Lee, 2004, p. 14). The preceding means large cannabis growing supplies and thus its availability in the plant form for local residents. The country, Pakistan, consists of four provinces, with Peshawar occupying the Northwest Frontier, which is also known as the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Lee, 2004, p. 14) This region “…is a semi-autonomous area where the government of Pakistan has limited authority” and represents the primary location of the country’s traffickers and drug laboratories, with many having armed guards (Lee, 2004, p. 14). Areas with a concentration of drug trafficking also are known to have corrupt officials who inform traffickers concerning governmental activities, and in Pakistan, there are a number of tribal leader traffickers that are in politics “…and have become members of Pakistan's national assembly” (Lee, 2004, p. 14). “Corruption is deeply rooted in the social and political history of …” Pakistan, according to the chairman of Pakistan’s National Accountability Bureau, Lt. General Munir Hafiez (ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific, 2002). In 1997 Pakistan was labeled as the second most corrupt country in the world (Hassan, 1999), and in 2005 Pakistan was placed at number 144 out of 158 countries in terms of its corruption ranking (Hassan, 2006). The report by Burhanuddin Hassan (2006) informs us that corruption is the “… major cause of poverty …” and thus subjugated its populace to a lack of opportunities, future and earnings. Corruption also ranks as the number one reason that country is a major drug trafficker (Lee, 2004, p. 14). The cheap and plentiful supply of all varieties of drugs in Pakistan has resulted in a culture that along with Iran, represents the largest percentage of drug users globally (International Crisis Group, 2001).

In the “Handbook of Research on the Illicit Drug Traffic: Socioeconomic and Political Consequences”, Tullis (1991, pp 97-102) advises that the efforts of governmental authorities in applying laws against drugs creates opportunities for profits and thus attracts criminal enterprises and individuals to supply a market. The international efforts to control and reduce the flow of drugs, has resulted in a raft of national, bilateral and multilateral agreements, and efforts “…to enforce the antidrug laws, decrees, treaties, and conventions” (Tullis, 1995, p. 89). The operative theory behind international drug laws is “…curtail both consumption and production” (Tullis, p. 89). Interestingly, he notes that most countries, excepting Pakistan and Thailand, “…appear to be more concerned about production than about consumption” (Tullis, 1995, p. 89). Internationally, the primary strategy in the control of illicit drugs has entailed the suppression of supply based on the idea that the lack of supply will result in reduced consumption as a result of increased prices on the street (Tullis, 1995, p. 89).

The United Nations initiatives on controlling drugs, as evidenced by the “…1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, the 1981 International Drug Abuse Control Strategy, the 1984 Declaration on the Control of Drug Trafficking and Drug Abuse, a 1987 Draft Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, and a 1987 International Conference on Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking …” has not significantly altered the production of illicit drugs (Tullis, 1995, p. 91). The principle driving force in international drug enforcement and cooperation is the United States, whose principle focus is on Turkey (Spain, 1975, pp. 395-409) as well as Pakistan, Latin America, Mexico, and Italy (Rubin, 1985). The philosophy and strategy of the United States represents suppressing the flow of product at its source, as opposed to Europe’s focus in user treatment and supplier interdiction as secondary (Tullis, 1995, p. 91). The money and personnel supplied by the United States, along with other political and economic means, has enlisted cooperation from governments that do not wish to incur the its wrath , thus most “…Net consuming and producing nations have responded in varying ways to the social and economic overhead of production, consumption, and control of illicit drugs” (Tullis, 1995, p. 91). It, cannabis, is the most broadly produced as well as trafficked drug in the world, and the vast open regions of Pakistan located near Peshawar, and its proximity to Afghanistan, along with corruption and opportunity makes it readily available on the local level as well as induces the populace to seek connections with the drug trade for income as well as use (CND, 2006).

The United States policy of interdiction has failed to stem the flow of drugs and also is viewed as contributing to the worsening of social and economic stability in countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan, thus deepening their dependence on earnings from this area, and contributing to increased poverty, and drug use in their own countries (International Crisis Group, 2001). There are an estimated 4.1 million drug addicts in Pakistan, of which approximately half are addicted to heroin. The activities as represented by interdiction policies initiated by the United States as well as the country’s own political, and economic policies have contributed to a dramatic increase in poverty as well as social problems (Khan, 2002). Because of its proximity to Afghanistan, Peshawar has become the gateway for the trafficking of drugs from that country as well as its own production, and growing facilities (Khan, 2002). The high rate of drug addicts is a result of the cheap supply, and high availability of drugs locally that has affected the regions residents. In examining the extent of the drug problem in Pakistan, Dr. Parveen Azam Khan (2002) advises that adolescents begin experimentation with drugs starting at 15 years of age, and this is a result of the socio-cultural as well as religious background that as aided in facilitating demand. He continues that the primary factors that contribute to the preceding are represented by (Khan, 2002):

  1. The region’s high illiteracy rates, the lack of social activities, and life skills for the adolescents as well as young adults to deal with the problems of poverty, stress, unemployment and boredom.
  2. The rapid pace of change in terms of urbanization, industrialisation and moderisation has caught the populace in a time warp in terms if new ideas, processes and fundamental changes to their socio-cultural and traditional values.
  3. The ease in which drugs can be obtained and the high usage rate creates an atmosphere whereby almost all adolescents and young adults are caught in a system that induces trial and use as a means to escape their daily stress and lack of opportunities.
  4. The overall lack of educational processes and information on a meaningful scale regarding the effects and pitfalls associated with drug use.

The problem is extremely pervasive, in that employed people are also caught in the web of drug usage. As opposed to the arrest and convict strategy employed in the United States that has been recently abandoned by some European countries in favor of treatment, and permissiveness to have small amounts, the situation in Pakistan differs significantly in terms of cultural as well as socio-economic, and other factors (Khan, 2002). American as well as European youths, young adults, other users and addicts, have a broader range of social, economic, and other opportunities, however, in terms of addiction, there are many similarities in that hard core drugs use in the United States as well as Europe tends to drug use and addiction.

In terms of equating a common set of possibilities, linkages and or commonalities associated with drug use, and its entry as well as addiction, Wohlwill (1973, pp. 102-110) advises that the:

“…developmental trajectories can be described in terms of a variety of parameters indicating presence of change; direction of change; shape of trajectory; values of maxima, minima, or terminal levels; sequencing of events; timing of events; and/or age corresponding to specified values of any of those characteristics. The sheer number of possible parameters serves as a reminder that whichever one is used in empirical studies can only provide a very incomplete picture of individual differences in developmental trajectories. The empirical study of such parameters can be aimed at two somewhat different objectives”

The preceding translates into the fact that the overall sheer potential number of possibilities means that equating possible commonalities among differing sets of individuals in terms of developmental paths represents a process that can yield inconclusive data (Wohlwill, 1973, pp. 102-110). As a result of the preceding, he advises that there must be sufficient common base factors that provide a higher degree of commonality to make such comparisons and equations more valid (Wohlwill, 1973, pp. 102-110). In studies conducted by Kandel et al (1992, pp. 447-457) it was found that there was a general common sequence representing drug use progression that in most cases began with cigarettes and alcohol, advancing to cannabis and potentially onto other harder drugs. They reported that in samplings taken in the United States of adolescents and young adults, including other countries, found that the foregoing commonality regarding cigarettes, alcohol, cannabis, and potentially harder drug use had plausibility (Kandel et al, 1992, pp. 447-457). The preceding findings represent the Gateway Theory, whereby alcohol, cannabis and cigarettes represent a highly plausible path to hard drugs for a percentage of those in the foregoing user group when said usage is heavy as well as combined with other contributing factors (Golub and Johnson, 1994, pp. 607-614). Important contributing factors were found to be income levels, education and peer group associations (Mackesy-Amiti et al, 1997, pp. 185-196). It should be noted that studies conducted by Kandel et al (1992, pp. 447-457) also stressed that one stage of usage does not necessarily lead to others, but that the entry into one stage may be the starting point for later progression.

In terms of commonalities with Pakistan youths, a study by Chou and Pickering (1992, pp. 1199-1204), they found that the younger a person gets involved with cigarettes, alcohol, and cannabis, the more likely they are to become heavy users and potentially progress to harder drugs. Their studies identified the ages of 12 through 17, and the earlier one started using cannabis and or alcohol, the more likely their usage patterns would escalate (Chou and Pickering, 1992, pp. 1199-1204). Skinner (1990, pp. 17-22) indicates that dependence is based upon heavier consumption patterns prior to abuse, thus in equating the level of dependency, one must be aware of the length, and intensity of the patterns involved. There are those that oppose the preceding view of age being a potential predictor of the possibility for heavier later cannabis, and or harder drug use, arguing that the results are not conclusive enough (Holland and Griffin, 1984, pp. 79-89). At the heart of the matter, is why some people use cannabis, while others do not. Goode, (1969, p. 15) offers the idea that there are two ways in which to explore the preceding, psychological, and sociological. He states that the psychological approach seeks answers as to the why one does what ones does, whereas in this context the sociological adds the conditions, circumstances, and outside influences acting upon individuals that may prompt them to make certain choices they might not make if other conditions, and or circumstances were not present (Goode, 1969, p. 15). Users of cannabis, for all practical purposes, can be classified in the same category as opiate addicts (Ausubel, 1969, p. 17), they suffer from a number of or singular facets whereby the usage of cannabis is a product of “…inadequate personalities, anxiety neurotics, and depressives”. He adds that (Ausubel, 1969, p. 17):

“The symptomatic group consists mainly of aggressive psychopaths in whom marijuana smoking is merely one relatively minor manifestation of pervasive antisocial trends. The reactive group is made up of essentially normal teenage youths who respond aggressively to the status deprivation of adolescence as aggravated by particular socioeconomic, racial, or ethnic factors”.

Ausubel (1969, p. 17) indicates that “… recreational users are found in all three categories, while “… habitual users are most frequently inadequate personalities”. The importance of the preceding examination of types of users, and the associated factors plays a role in potential treatment and prevention techniques in that understanding the path that lead current users to drugs. The reasons for using are key points in understanding the treatment paths as well as preventive path to take. The foregoing points to the differing treatment, and preventive modes being utilized, thus the American model of arrest and punishment does not fit the Pakist



rev

Our Service Portfolio

jb

Want To Place An Order Quickly?

Then shoot us a message on Whatsapp, WeChat or Gmail. We are available 24/7 to assist you.

whatsapp

Do not panic, you are at the right place

jb

Visit Our essay writting help page to get all the details and guidence on availing our assiatance service.

Get 20% Discount, Now
£19 £14/ Per Page
14 days delivery time

Our writting assistance service is undoubtedly one of the most affordable writting assistance services and we have highly qualified professionls to help you with your work. So what are you waiting for, click below to order now.

Get An Instant Quote

ORDER TODAY!

Our experts are ready to assist you, call us to get a free quote or order now to get succeed in your academics writing.

Get a Free Quote Order Now