The Level Of Satisfaction On Special Organization

Published Date: 02 Nov 2017

Fig 24: shows the overall level of satisfaction of students and teachers

The bar chart above shows the level of satisfaction of both students and teachers on their school environment. The result shows the following:

44.57 % consider their school environment to be good

6.286 % consider it to be very good

13.14 % consider it to be poor

And 36 % are neither happy nor dissatisfied with the design of their school environment.

Comparison of factors

Thermal comfort

Fig 25: shows the level of satisfaction on the Natural ventilation

The above graph shows the level of satisfaction of school building users (students and teachers) on the efficiency of natural ventilation in their classes, studios, and offices. It shows that 44% of the respondents are satisfied, 36% are not satisfied and 20% are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the design of their school environment.

Lighting

Fig 26: shows the level of satisfaction on the daylighting

The chart below shows the level of satisfaction of both students and teachers on the efficiency of daylight in their studios, offices, and classrooms. After combining the results it was found 44% of the respondents are satisfied while 20 % are not satisfied and 36% are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the design of their school environment.

Green spaces

Fig 27: shows the level of satisfaction on the efficiency of green spaces

The bar chart below shows the level of satisfaction of both students and teachers on the efficiency of green spaces found in their school environment. 36 % of the respondents rated their school environment to be good while 8% rated it to be poor; and 8 % rated it to be very good while 48 % are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the design of their school environment.

Building materials:

Fig 28: level of satisfaction on school building materials

The bar chart above shows the level of satisfaction of both students and teacher on the materials used for the design of their school. It shows that 32 % are satisfied; 20 % are not satisfied and 48 % are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied on the materials used for the design of their school.

Spaces:

Fig 29: shows the level of satisfaction on special organization

The bar chart above shows the level of satisfaction of students and teachers on the organization of indoor and outdoor spaces in their school environment. The result shows that more than half of respondents (56%) consider their school environment to good; 8 % consider it to be very good; 4 % consider it to be poor while 32 % are neither happy nor unhappy with the design of their school environment.

Classroom:

Fig 30: level satisfaction on the design of classrooms

The above graph shows the level of satisfaction of school building users (students and teachers) on the design of their classrooms or studios. By combining the results it was found that 68 % are satisfied while 4 % are not satisfied and 28 % are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the design of their classrooms/studios.

Aesthetic:

Fig 31: shows the level of satisfaction on the overall school’s design

The graph above shows the level of satisfaction of both students and teachers on the overall design of their school environment. The following results are found:

52 % are satisfied

8 % are very satisfied

And 40 % are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Conclusion:

According to the above results it was found that students and teachers are mostly satisfied with organization of indoor and outdoor spaces and mostly dissatisfied with the materials used for the design of their building.

Users point of view by status

Students point of view

Fig 32: students satisfaction in Taylor’s university

The bar chart above shows the level of satisfaction of students with the design of their school environment. After combining the results it was found that students are mostly satisfied with the design of their school environment as shown in the following results:

47.144 % are satisfied

14.29 % are not satisfied

And 38.57 % are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Teachers point of view

Fig 33: shows the level of satisfaction of teachers

The graph above shows the level of satisfaction of teacher in the design of their school environment. The following results have been found:

65.711 % are satisfied

8.571 are not satisfied

And 25.71 % are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the design of their school environment.

Conclusion:

From the above results it can be concluded that both students and lecturers are satisfied with the design of their school environment. The results show that teachers are more satisfied then students.

2.2.3 Analysis of the level of sustainability applied in Taylor’s university:

Overall percentage

Fig 34: showing the level of sustainability applied in Taylor’s university

The graph above shows the level of sustainability applied in Taylor’s University form the teachers and students point of view. After combining the results, the following have been found:

61.6 % agree

26 % disagree

And 23.2 % neither agree nor disagree with the level of sustainability applied in their school environment.

Comparison of factors:

The following is from a students and teachers perspective.

Climate, energy and water

Renewable energy

Fig 35: showing the level of application of sustainable methods to save energy

The bar chart above shows the level of application of sustainable features or methods in order to save energy with the school campus. 20 % of respondents agree while 20 % disagree; and 8 % strongly agree while 52 % neither agree nor disagree with the application of sustainable features or methods in order to save energy within the school campus.

Reduction of water use

Fig 36: level of application of sustainable methods for water use reduction

The bar chart above shows the level of application of sustainable features or methods in order to reduce the usage or wastage of water within the school environment. After combining the results it has been found that 48% of respondents agree, 20 % disagree while 32 % neither agree of disagree with the application of sustainable features in order to reduce the usage or wastage of water within their school environment.

Community planning and design

Green spaces

Fig 37: showing the level of efficiency of green spaces

The graph above shows the level of efficiency of green space form the students and teachers point of view. It shows the following:

88 % agree

8 % strongly agree

And 4 % neither agree nor disagree with the efficiency of green spaces within their school environment.

Secure design

Fig 38: showing the level of application of sustainability for secure design

The bar chart above shows the level of application of sustainable features and materials in order to provide security in Taylor’s University. More than half of the respondents (56%) agreed while 8 % disagree and 16 % strongly agreed and 8 % neither agreed of disagreed with the application of sustainable features and materials for security purpose within their school environment.

Transportation and connectivity

Facilities for public transportation

Pic 39: showing respondents perspective of the facilities of public transportation

Above is a representation of students and teachers point of view on the facilities of public transportation provided within their school environment. After combining the results it was found that 56 % of the respondents agreed while 28 % disagreed and 16 % neither agreed nor disagreed with the availability of public transportation within or near their school campus

Pedestrian network

Pic 40: showing respondents point of view on the availability of facilities for pedestrian network

The bar charts above it a representation of teacher and students point of view on the application of sustainable methods in order to provide facilities for public transportation. It was found that more than half of the respondents (68 %) are satisfied while 20 % are dissatisfied and 12 % are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the pedestrian networking within their campus.

Building and resources:

Low impact materials

Fig 41: showing respondents point of view on the application of low impact materials

Above is a graphical representation of the level of application of low impact materials in the design of Taylor’s University from students and teachers point of view. It was found that 44 % of the respondents agree while 16 % disagree and 40 % neither agree nor disagree with the application of low impact material in their school design.

Use of local materials

Fig 42: showing respondents point of view on the usage of local building materials

The bar chart above shows students and teachers point of view on the application of local building material in the design of their school. The following have been found: 48 % agreed; 24 % disagreed; 8 % strongly agreed; and 20 % neither agreed of disagreed on the usage of local building materials in the design of their school.

Business and innovation

Innovation in building design

Fig 43: showing the level of innovation applied in the design of the school’s building

The graph above is a students and teachers response on the application of any innovative method in the design of buildings in their school environment. It was found that more than half of the respondents (64 %) agree while 8 % disagree and 4 % strongly agree with the incorporation of innovative features in the design of their school’s buildings.

Innovation in the indoor and outdoor special organization

Fig 44: showing the level of innovation applied in the organization of indoor and outdoor spaces

The bar chart shows the students and teachers point of view on the application of innovation in the organization of indoors and outdoors spaces in the design of their school. After combining the results, the following have been found:

80 % of respondents agreed

8% disagreed

And 12 % neither agreed nor disagree with the incorporation of any innovative method in the organization of indoors and outdoors spaces within their school environment.

Conclusion

From the analysis made above, it has been found that students and teachers mostly agree with the incorporation of green spaces and the application of innovation in the organization of indoors and outdoors spaces while they mostly disagree with the application of sustainability in order to renew energy

Respondents point of view by status

Student point of view

Fig 45: showing students point of view on the level of sustainability applied

The bar chart above represents the point of view of students on the level of sustainability applied in their school form a general view. It results shows the following:

62% mostly agree

15.5 % mostly disagree

And 22.5 % neither agree nor disagree on the application of sustainability in the overall design of their school.

Teachers point of view

Fig 46: showing students point of view on the level of sustainability applied

The graph above is a response of teachers on the level of sustainability applied in their school environment. After combining the results, the following are found:

60 % of teachers agreed

14 % disagreed

And 26 % neither agreed nor disagreed on the application of sustainability in the overall design of their school.

conclusion

The analysis made above shows that students and teachers mostly agree on the application of sustainability in the design of their school environment. It also shows that the percentage of students who agreed is higher than the percentage of teachers.

Chi-square test:

3.1 Analysis

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

102.231a

16

.000

Likelihood Ratio

70.428

16

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

30.983

1

.000

N of Valid Cases

350

a. 7 cells (28.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.05.

The table above is the "Chi-Square test" used to analyze whether there is a relationship between the level of satisfaction of school building users (students and teachers) and the level of sustainability applied in architecture schools environment. The following results are found:

Cells < 5

Pearson chi-square <0.05

3.2 Conclusion

Based on the results given by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 16.0) software on the "Chi-square test" we can conclude that there is a strong relationship between the level of satisfaction of students and teachers and the level of sustainability applied in architecture schools environment.